The leader in workers’ compensation defense law.

Counseling employers and insurance carriers throughout California.

Subscribe

Subscribe to our email list to receive bulletins as well as invitations to our latest seminars and workshops.

Join Our Email List

Seminar Archives

Another One Bites the Dust . . . settlements, settlements my kingdome for a settlement

Obtaining a zero MSA takes careful thought and consideration, just like all aspects of a workers compensation case.  However, Defendants should be particularly prudent because an underfunded zero MSA account will ultimately be defendant’s medical treatment liability.


read more

“When the walls come tumblin’ down” – The Case of Applied Materials and the Effect of Treater Misconduct.

The Applied Materials case is a history of worker’s compensation theory and application since 1983 starting with Le Beof, then Western Growers and going through Hikida and resting with Fitzpatrick. The bottom line is that the system failed this injured worker by having an unprofessional physician handle the treatment for this applicant; the rest is left for history.


read more

“All in all it was just a Brick in the Wall” – Who Needs Settlements Any Way

Now, since settlement documents can be virtually walked through, make sure you upload in advance all supporting documentation including all QME/AME reports, denial letters, and any other documents to support the basis of your settlement.


read more

HOW TO AVOID A “SNATCH DEFEAT FROM THE JAWS OF VICTORY”

It is not enough for a doctor to simply assign a percentage of non-industrial apportionment, as was the case in Moreno. If you are in receipt of a report with a similar conclusory opinion on apportionment, do not assume that such opinion will be approved by a judge in determining an applicant’s permanent disability. Recall that it is the defendant’s burden to prove that apportionment is supported by substantial medical evidence. There are options that must be undertaken prior to settling in order for the opinion to hold up in court.


read more

A Vision of Apportionment

As such, the Panel determined that the section refers to the totality of the character of the disability, not the totality of causation of or liability for that disability.


read more

“CATASTROPHIC INJURY” DEFINED…SOMEWHAT

The ultimately implication here is that whether a condition is “catastrophic” will now be placed into the hands of the fact finder, returning the medical questions to the jurisdiction of the WCAB and outside of the hands of the medical professionals, and more likely than not, this will lead to decisions that are not even across the board, which goes completely contrary to the intent of the legislature when drafting SB 863.


read more

A Bold Strategy to Avoid Adding of Disabilities

Although the statements made in the Fitzpatrick footnote are dicta, clearly the Third District Court of Appeal expressed significant concerns with the arguments made by the WCAB itself in favor of the theory by which it justifies adding disabilities instead of using the Combined Values Table. My recommendation is to argue that Kite is no longer valid law on which the WCAB may support a decision and neither is any case which cites Kite or its progeny for its basis.


read more

The Ongoing Battle for the Add-On Disability

Notwithstanding the exceptions, it would appear that Labor Code §4660.1(c) has achieved its intended purpose by severely reducing the number of “compensable consequence” sleep, sex and psyche claims since its enactment in 2013.


read more

Dynamex or Borello: Prepare Your Umbrella for Both Storms

if the workers’ compensation system ultimately adopts the abbreviated, three-element “ABC” test from the California Supreme Court’s wage order decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court (2018), 4 Cal. 5th 903, 83 Cal. Comp. Cases 817, the presumption may become more difficult to rebut. Conciseness is attractive; but Dynamex on early analysis requires far less careful weighing of interlocking factors proffered by defendants to rebut the presumption of employment relationship.


read more

Applicant Fails to Prove Permanent Total Disability Under Labor Code Section 4662

BURR vs. THE BEST DEMOLITION AND RECYCLING COMPANY, INC.
(2018) 2018 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 143


read more